The number one "amenity" which Konterra should provide is a building that, as much as possible, blends into its surroundings. One that provides a pleasing visual and step-downs so that it doesn't dwarf surrounding residential or present a large wall as one approaches from the Capitol View Park side. Most importantly, the scale of the building needs to be respectful of our landmark train station. As provided for in the design guidelines, the building should offer pedestrian-friendly streetscape. That means retail. Support for the Kensington Sector Plan has been predicated on the idea that Kensington would be vibrant and walkable. That we would have new development which would obviate the need for Kensington residents to drive to Bethesda or Silver Spring if they wanted to dine or shop. Because Konterra is the first project in the revitalization of the Town, it is imperative that this building demonstrate respect for the design guidelines and offer Kensingtonians a taste of what is to come. Those who believed that Konterra should be allowed 75 feet now have something to prove. That developments like these can be good and appropriate neighbors.

I kind of had my heart set on a clock tower.

Big Egg - why don't you tell us where you live and they can put the clock tower in your front yard.

Campanile, anyone?

I think we should all get clock towers from them to put on all of our houses!

Where can I find out more about the clock tower?

It's not that I don't have a sense of humor. But really, this is one of the most serious matters we'll face as a municipality. And it isn't exactly a laugh riot to those who live in the Metropolitan Ave/Kensington Pkwy neighborhood. Can we please be grown-ups? There isn't going to be anything funny about a huge apartment building with a facade that's a parking garage, clock tower notwithstanding.

I think this is going to be hashed out an upcoming charette. We will have to be careful to distinguish between features that are required of any building by virtue of the sector plan and design guidelines, versus "extras" that are put forth to justify the request for additional height.

That said, I think a clock or bell tower *could* be a nice feature. Especially one that has a train-related theme.

Mr Bartram, though we don't typically agree, I think you've encapsulated the issue very well. We shouldn't be distracted by "nice to have" versus "need to have." It is my interpretation based on what's been written, testimony from Fred Boyd, etc., that pedestrian-friendly streetscape is "need to have" as is respect for the scale of surrounding residential and the train station. I hope the charrette is inclusive, impartial, professional and in-depth enough to accomplish those goals and unite the community around these important changes.

An aesthetically pleasing design woudl be nice, but let's face it...anything new and decent.. and why shouldn't they provide that since they want to attract renters...willl be much better than the gravel pitt and eyesores that have dominated. People, lets welcome Konterra to the neighborhood as friends who come in peace and a start of something new and great. Personally, I would love to have a nice coffee shop...even if a chain...and a small "Trader Joes" type of organic food place.

I know some people who deal with branding for Thomas the Train. I am happy to approach them about a tasteful rendering to augment the clock tower. While I know people in Chevy Chase view would prefer it be a cuckoo clock or even something digital, I think we should keep it traditional and tasteful so its in keeping with the historic aesthetic of the town.